How to be gaslighting you as soon as the time stamps from all of these commentary are obviously noticeable?

February 23, 2021 by

I’ll come back to Laura R’s presumably antagonistic line: it’s fine for gay/lesbian people to claim her, but We also think it’s only a little shitty for all your people into the reviews to grumble about other people claiming Waverly as bi.“ We think”

This comment accepts that lesbians have actually a right to claim Waverly, which hits me as pretty diplomatic. She’s maybe maybe not arguing that lesbians should not claim her, just that bi females could also achieve this and that yes, it is unneeded to insistently refuse to just accept that bi females may claim this character too. When grasped in the context for the comment that is entire small shitty’ isn’t specially confrontational and sometimes even suggest. Also so I think it’s disingenuous to pretend that your tone escalated in response to others when in fact it was accusatory from the get go if I were to accept that ‘a little shitty’ is a shitty word choice, Laura R.’s comment came hours after your first comment about how calling Waverly bi means that all queer women are bisexual by default. How do I be gaslighting you if the right time stamps because of these remarks are plainly noticeable?

Once more, the standard argument that this character is really gay rather than bi, is it self maybe perhaps not ‘a small shitty’. In reviewing the proof presented, I’m inclined to concur to you that Waverly may possibly not be bi. What exactly is shitty, is the fact that you’ve twisted this in to situation of lesbian erasure therefore the presumption that Heather believes we’re all bisexual by standard. There are some other choices that may explain the decision to incorporate Waverly in this list:

it is too early to offer her any label at all Heather has another type of interpretation as a lesbian in the future that she can reasonably back up because the evidence doesn’t immediately point to a singular conclusion Heather, a TV writer who may have access to promo materials from showrunners etc, has a document somewhere with a blurb in which Waverly is described as bisexual Heather made a mistake because she is human, and may decide to remove Waverly from the list or describe her

You can decide to start thinking about those choices in the place of concluding that Heather, that is a lesbian by by herself, supports lesbian erasure.

I am aware that Autostraddle authors’ views do carry more excess weight than that of a fan that is single. Nevertheless, the idea that the showrunners are likely to base future choices about Waverly’s characterization in the ‘official’ designation provided by Autostraddle is, once again, a rather hyperbolic claim. Heather had been probably the most prominent reviewer that is lesbian of Little Liars and those show runners certainly didn’t base their choices on the analysis. Wynona Earp’s writers clearly have actually an idea with this character along with her love life (which probably simply involves making that incredibly popular ship endgame) and aren’t planning to say ‘we originally desired to make her gay but we can’t not in favor of Autostraddle’.

We DO see an issue in making use of articles for bi exposure week as a place to declare that a lesbian whom possibly mislabeled a woman that is gay bisexual didn’t just make an error but earnestly seeks to damage lesbians. In addition see a challenge with whining about bisexual fandoms in this context, once the behaviour that is prior of fandoms has nothing in connection with this short article or the commenters right right right here. We recognize that lesbians don’t have monopoly on behavior similar to this either, and that bi individuals DO also leap to conclusions and also perpetuate lesbophobia/lesbian erasure, but that’s not exactly exactly what has occurred right right right here and also this wasn’t the area for such escalation.